Yenni Kurnia Fitri, Hermawati Syarif, Desvalini Anwar


The research aims to find out the levels of questions used by an English teacher for mid-semester reading test for the second graders in SMA 2 Padang in accordance Anderson’s and Karthwohl’s taxonomy (2001). The participant was chosen based on purposive sampling. This is a descriptive research. The data of the research were obtained from documents analysis. Evaluation of the question sheets were analyzed one by one. After that, the data were analyzed, grouped, and explained based on the research aims. The results of this research show that the teacher formulated on three levels of questions. They are the questions remembering (46.67%), understanding (36.66%), and applying (16.67%). From the result, it can be concluded almost half of the questions are in the form of remembering and least of them for applying.


Reading Test, levels of question, Anderson’s and Karthwohl’s taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF (English)


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longmans.

Banks, S. R. (2012). Classroom Assessment: Issues and Practices. Illinois: Waveland Press.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. United States of America: Longmans.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education.

Calmorin, L. P., & Calmorin, M. A. (2007). Research Methods and Thesis Writing. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company, Inc.

Chi Duc, N. (2008). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Design in-class Reading Questions for Intermediate Students in the Context of Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science,Foreign Languages, 24, 175–183.

Fiprinita, R. (2007). Types of Question Asked by Teachers in Classroom Interactions. Unpublished Thesis. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Forehand, M. (2012). Bloom’s Taxonomy: from Emerging Perspectives on learning, Teaching and Technology. Retrieved on January 10th, 2015 at

Gall, M. D., & Borg. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Goodwin, S. . (1992). Effective Classroom Questioning. Urbana-Champaign: office of instructional and managements, University of Illionis.

Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2003). Analysis of Turkish High-School Chemistry-Examination Questions According to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(1), 25–30.

Mantyi-Ncube, B., & Hlophe, N. (2011). Teaching Testing Higher Cognitive Skills: A Case of Selected High Schools in Swaziland 10–029/AWB/2011/7–2–63–68. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences.

Munzenmaier, C. and N. R. (2013). Bloom’s Taxonomy What’s Old Is New Again. The Learning Guild Research. Retrieved on February 20th, 2014 at

Pickard, M. J. (2007). The New Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview for Family and Consumer Sciences. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 25(1).

Richlin, L. (2006). Blueprint for Learning: Constructing College Courses to Facilitate, Assess, and Document Learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

Zimmaro, D. M. (2004). Writing Good Multiple-Choice Exams. The University of Texas. Retrieved on March 12, 2013 at



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







Ta'dib Visitor

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal Ta'dib distribute under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.

Contact us: Ta'dib; Address: FTIK, IAIN Batusangkar; Jl. Sudirman No. 137 Lima Kaum Batusangkar, Tanah Datar, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Email: